把人的blog在這裡link上了,就省我bookmark的工夫,
何況峰的blog,還有些links,
除了才發現yy有個blog(有篇文見到有編輯肯同佢逐句跟,真難得),
也上了很久沒上的coffedrinkcat,並才發現doris早前已寫了點關於尋樂經驗和關於我的文字.

就關於尋樂經驗那點,等到過到久到難找到不如不要找才sorry一聲地答susan,我的出在信報的展評,其實說著的東西,原來經已有這接近源頭消息可引證,本不用我瞎猜,但也證明我在尋樂尋出政治來不是無中生有.

至於我的無心（力）戀戰這點,doris又是在我不知情下變成了osage kt的poster中幫我想出來的一年不策展計劃?(不過多謝昨日和luke傾完又傾,我其實有幾多新計劃覺得這次真的會攪了.不過還是要忙完些尾巴,兌現幾張支票才會開始,而到時就也要靠大家真金白銀的多多支持.)

而從上次提到lee kit找我來搞他的作品,到doris不問自來,我在想這是什麼樣的小圈子玩意,個圈的其他人會怎樣想.事實上,我那天在osage kt走到counter問關於demonstration那作品後,職員(一如常問其他人般)追問我感覺展覽怎樣,又問我是不是圈中人.那我估,這種小圈子的玩意可能真的唔work,連看場的都唔知作品指涉誰.

當然(這是香港藝圈的換人流速所慣常不過的無歷史意識,又或在osage桌上出版間,找不著chie!的去歷史意圖),我樂得這種匿名,多於被人認出的虛榮,因為唔識我(又不是如李傑被誤認黃貫中),使我更加可以肯定自己的虛榮,即,個圈真無料到,人人唔識我,真好打有限!

另順提,見到書店有chie!場刊賣,我的感覺很不舒服,一來書很水皮,二來好像出賣了些本應not for sale的東西.所以,若有人仍想要本,請就向我開聲,我就會盡量找來本免費的給你.

那一天突然想到一個問題,就是為什麼沒有人問威尼斯的展覽回來香港展幹嗎,卻問一個關於香港的展覽在展場幹嗎.

well, talked with Tobias again today, and I decided personally to shrink further my previous entry over the foyer trouble with Osage for it turn out to be another unfortunate mis-communication between different parties, and I am happy to apologize for any false accusation to anyone based on incomplete facts. (the fact is ofcourse, how come I also have only the incomplete facts?)

The fact, it seems, is that they did asked and communicated (unfortunately) with Tobias (and not us curators of the show), about what they want to do with the foyer projection, while we curators were then still thinking and attempting to use the foyer projection for showing our participants' work. For us, work of art always should have the priorty, and hence we were particularly dissatisfy then, with the intended work showing there being replaced by a design that has not our (curators') endorsement.

I certainly do not want to put all the blame on to Tobias, for our idea over the projection at the foyer is a rather late decision, and I principally agreed with Tobias then, that it will be a waste of our energy with what I proposed to do, that of asking both Norman and us to meet with Osage and decide together on what to do with the front projection.
Yet taking in Tobias' advise on the spot, I shifted to response to it in the CHiE blog afterwards, by trying to see or link this experience with the topic of creative commons vs copy, a new kind of practice that has an unclear border, a grey zone, which is also a part of what the show is trying to address. What is stealing if we are trying to opening up copyright? What is it (or Why is it) that our designer was feeling bad about this? I believe all these, beyond curators being the final decision makers, should be a lesson for us to think about.

here is a link to OPEN KNOWLEDGE.