今日我隨便糊亂說時,卻竟給我悟出了ampost為什麼要列一埋都唔知介紹來做乜的外國嘢,原因好簡單,不是因外國比較high,而係話俾人聽,篇幅我有,但我就是不會白白為你們作報導,要就來買位落廣告.

什麼是專業artist?學嘢喇!

(唔知個專業嘅燕窩團隊俾幾多錢,美心俾幾多錢,acc又俾幾多錢我們專業的artist呢?)

邊到有官拍片拍到好似曾俊華咁,2009-10年度財政預算案諮詢拍了堆片,要人俾意見,好似我們欠了佢,係我地唔啱咁?
去搜集民意,係你嘅責任,你卻花錢話我們做乜唔得閒!驚落區被人掟蕉?

我們對你諮詢的誠意和落實的能力無期望呀,收到無?

本星一那信報,其實還有兩大版市區重建策略的廣告.
但處處都是指鹿為馬,偷換概念.


保育/發展,理想/現實等平衡經已是假對立,


灣仔和昌大押是活化的成功例子?!


一再把籠屋spectacle化展出更是可恥唔知醜,
舊區有籠屋,不是因為他們是舊區,而係是政府唔照顧窮人,窮人在舊區才如此勉強生存.試問重建舊區點樣幫到班籠民?

After having post the clip of Where the Hell is Matt? sometime ago,
I saw lately a variation of it, but an ad for a credit card company.
this time not an imitation, but with Matt in it.

I felt quite outrage about it really,
(maybe even more? than if it is an imitation)

though I have not been in any of his video before,
but I have help spread this then"seemingly innocence" idea!

If these new clips are retake,
with hired actors, than it is "fake".
(and they are still depending upon the "generosity" of the people that help build up the project before it.)
if they are not, people in it are being exploited.

For me, either way is quite a wrong place for this project to end up with.
(but if it is not the end, as more people then know about Matt and share the previous clips?)

Maybe, the case hurts most for the words in the ad is definitely over the top, that he travels everywhere without using every local currency, which I bet is exaggerating and thus a lie!

This idea of something universal, might be in tune with Matt's project, but at the same time, this accepted worldwide credit card affording travel without even paying attention (finding this part of the experience) to the variety of local matters is exactly the worst kind of attitude that a world traveller could have.

目的(為當選)>手段(容歪理) !?

當一個大學的持續教育都以分餅作為宣傳,
會考追優,吹補習風,恐怕也只能順理成章.