web analytics
mMK

2008年11月7日 星期五

Earlier, been invited by C&G to participate in their coming exhibition "Greedy?" I am not sure if their press release has been out yet, or the one that I read being the final version.
here instead is the first of my artist's statement that I wrote for them, which will be continued throughout the period till the exhibition.


藝術家的話

2/11/08

接受展覽的邀請,多少是出自種貪婪。
若果,展覽,是向別人說話的平臺。我該是有說話想講吧。(若果,實際是沒有說話想向別人說呢?那這種貪婪還需要否一種戲劇性去再現?)但是講什麼好,什麼才是最值得借此平臺說出的話題?對於於貪婪,我最想說什麼呢?我要如何述說關於貪婪呢?在藝術作品與主題之間,如何講,才算得上有藝術性?
我雖不太信靠,但也得信靠--觀念藝術。一門什麼都可能可以是藝術的藝術。 對於這次展覽,我目前仍打算全方位的為此次展覽尋找一個滿意方案。我希望,我的展出作品不僅僅是對於「貪婪?」主題某一面相的一次展示,一次關於貪婪的完整式句子,而是更符合作為問題的那種開放性,讓自己也從中有所得著的…

artist statement

Accepting the invitation to exhibit, is perhaps already an act out of greediness.
If exhibition is a platform to speak to others, I do have something to say, or have I ? (If I don’t, this is probably a kind of greed good enough for to exhibit?) What is best for me to say on this platform, for this occasion? Upon greed, what do I most want to say? How am I to express it? How does an art work discuss about a theme?
Despite I have doubt, I do have to count on what counts as Conceptual Art. An art that everything could be (named) art. For this exhibition, I will continue to seek for the best option what to do upon this occasion. I do hope, my exhibit will not be a finished statement of mine upon the theme of “Greedy?”, but more in line with its question mark, that begs to open up, and via that I could truly gain something from the process …

更多的藝術家的話,將陸續張貼於mMK網誌。
More updated artist statement will be post on the blog of mMK.


wordcount恰恰是規定的500字上限.

1 則留言:

匿名 提到...

你對藝術的可能性比"一般人"貪心。可否這樣說?